Well, Phronk, I do hope you continue to advocate an essentially secularist, humanist approach to all theists of the fatuous, and dogmatic variety, wherever possible. You are clearly a formidable conveyer of nuanced arguments, which is a rare example indeed.
Well, Phronk, I do hope you continue to advocate an essentially secularist, humanist approach to all theists of the fatuous, and dogmatic variety, wherever possible. You are clearly a formidable conveyer of nuanced arguments, which is a rare example indeed.
10 comments:
they work!
they're not totally fucky!
lol
finally.
Oh they are totally fuckity fuck!
I had so much to say. Now I've forgotten what it was.
Well, Phronk, I do hope you continue to advocate an essentially secularist, humanist approach to all theists of the fatuous, and dogmatic variety, wherever possible. You are clearly a formidable conveyer of nuanced arguments, which is a rare example indeed.
Well, Phronk, I do hope you continue to advocate an essentially secularist, humanist approach to all theists of the fatuous, and dogmatic variety, wherever possible. You are clearly a formidable conveyer of nuanced arguments, which is a rare example indeed.
How did you get your comments button back??? I'm still missing mine. Please let me know. Thank you! carmelmandy@gmail.com
Working?
I am with Salem, what was I going to say???
Looks good. BTW, is that really R. Dawkins?
That's Richard Fauxkins. He's a regular on Dani's blog and is good with big words, but isn't the real Dawkins.
Richard: Thanks for the genteel accolade.
Looks like Dani is back, so we have our work cut out for us. :)
Post a Comment